July 03, 2009

Cool health issues mapping mashup

I came across this thanks to Tim O'Reilly's tweet on it. EpiSPIDER Map Exhibit

It spiders a whole bunch of sources, including online jnews for health-related stories and tries to locate them on the map. You can filter by disease type, country, province or state, Human development index, population, GDP and report age.

Now it also picks up some false positives like an NZ report on global swine flu numbers and locates them in NZ, but it also lets me know within an hour of the report that NSW has reported its first swine flu death.

List under cool tools



February 29, 2008

The Development Karaoke

Its always hard to explain what I do to someone who doesn't know the business; my wife has taken to saying, "he does internet stuff" and leaving it at that, I don't blame her.

But I had a discussion yesterday with a guy who is ICT for development, we'll call him V (not his real initial) who was having trouble figuring out why a project he is working on isn't working. He's done this stuff before, but he's working with a new group and can't make any headway.

V (or, as I call him, Vee) is from the country in question, but has been away a long time and has become pretty Americanised (in a good way - energetic, can-do, that stuff) and the people he is working with are from a different place and tribal group and a waaay different experience. So he calls me for some ideas. The chat we had is below, its anonymised and I've tidied up the Skype structure a bit, reconnected sentences and paragraphs that got split up by the chat format etc, but all the words are there.

This is what I do

Continue reading "The Development Karaoke" »

December 13, 2007

The privileged Life

Img_0002 If things are quiet around here its because I'm in Kuala Lumpur for the GK3 conference, hunting new participants for the Stockholm Challenge, handing out some awards at the gala dinner and looking out the window of the hotel at the Petronas Towers.

That alone is enough to put me well into the ranks of those with privileged lives on this planet.

But yesterday I ran into Mike Gurstein in the foyer and he invited me into an impromptu session on ICT, Media and indigenous peoples that followed on from a conference they had just finished in Bario in Sarawak. I've said for years that poor people aren't stupid, just poor; and the people doing things in Bario (which is OFF OFF-Grid and just held an international conference, organised and co-ordinated over the net from their local telecentre) are damned smart. Smart and energetic beyond belief for a soggy middle-aged westerner.

But even they paled a little beside a woman called Kyle who hopped up from the audience and talked about her project among forest tribes in the Philippines where illiterate communities are using GPS and GIS tools to map their land and contest it with logging companies. That alone will make a great entry in the Challenge.

But the killer is that the conceptual framework that the forest tribes use is so sophisticated and multidimensional, that the technology can't keep up. Yesss!!!

And then I just had breakfast with the great Michel Menou and got to have a conversation with him when I should just have shut up and listened.

On my tombstone they should write, "He had a privileged life, and he knew it". The big question will be whether I managed to do anything useful with that privilege

November 27, 2006

Everest Blogging

Partly for the hell of it and partly because I can, and partly to one-up Jon Husband who Skyped me a while ago from a Lufthansa flight somewhere over Newfoundland, as far as I can tell this is from somewhere over Mt Everest in the middle of the night.

I know its night because its like the inside of a cow out there, and there has been almost constant light "chop" since a while after we left Guanzhou on the way to Frankfurt.

Even better, since Boeing decided to pull out of its "Connexion" airborne Internet service, its now free on Lufthansa, at least till they sort pout what is going to happen to it next.

And what interests me about that is that their business model must have been based on assumptions about the number of business people who would pay for inflight  Internet. We know for sure THAT was wrong; what I'd love to know is how busy its been since it was free and why Lufthansa isn't now selling adverts on their login page.

But if the business flier can't sustain a business model for paid access, how do we imagine that  people in poor countries will be able to sustain paid access? Actually I'm on the way to Stockholm for some work on the Challenge where we will look again into exactly that question. Plus I've just spent a VERY interesting day in Manila talking with some cool people about some ideas for testing some connectivity propositions in the TXTing capital of the world. God I hope THAT works out.

Anyway, I'm off to play whack-a-mole with the mailbox spam and in half an hour to try calling my wife on Skype out.

Yeeehaaa!

/juvenile mucking about with technology

(as if)

August 01, 2006

Reality Bites - But May Not Drink

If this were not a condemnation of the Australian education and political system, it would be a comedy; instead of which it will become a tragic farce.

Last weekened, the people of Toowoomba had a poll on whether they would accept up to 25% treated sewage in their drinking water system. 

After a fiercely fought anti-water recycling campaign characterised by personal smears and misleading information, residents on Saturday rejected the local council's water plan by 62 per cent to 38 per cent.

So now the good people with the closed minds will have to open their wallets to pay for their dcision. Poll result means rising water bills.

Continue reading "Reality Bites - But May Not Drink" »

June 26, 2006

Where Do They Think It Comes From?

About 18 months ago, the Australian city of Goulburn announced that it would run out of water in 9 months if it didn't get some rain; but simultaneously announced a "plan to be self sufficient in water". It was a three year plan.

Since then, Goulburn has run out of water. Part of their plan was announced the other day, they are going to increase the height of the dam, the empty dam. The one that doesn't get any water.

   

Now, the Australian ity of TOOWOOMBA is running out of water. As with Goulburn, dam levels are dangerously low and the city is a long way from the sea, making desalination prohibitively expensive. The solution? Drink treated sewage.

   

[...] This time last year, the Mayor, Dianne Thorley, believed that she did not need to ask residents about drinking recycled water because they knew it was the only option. But with a month to go before the city's 90,000 residents vote in a referendum on council's proposal to source 25 per cent of its drinking water from effluent, Cr Thorley has yet to convince everyone her plan is the cheapest and safest solution.

   

Its not just Toowoomba that has a lot riding on the result. The referendum is viewed as a bellwether for the promotion of recycled drinking water. Success will buoy other councils hoping to implement similar schemes; failure could set back recycling for years.

   

[...] Led by one of Toowoomba's wealthiest citizens, the developer Clive Berghofer, recycling naysayers claim property prices will tumble and businesses fail when word gets out that the towns taps are flowing with treated sewage. "I dont want my city to die," Mr Berghofer said. He said he had lost three property sales recently because buyers did not want to live in a town where residents drank recycled water.

So I ask again, where the hell do these people think the water comes from? Do they have the vaguest concept of how it gets from their drain back into their tap again?

I should think he would be glad to have lost the sales; in fact the issue of recycling should be an intelligence test; if you aren't smart enough to understand why it is needed, nor figure out how the water cycle works in the first place, why would any city want you as a resident? You are plainly dumb as a rock. And if we have plenty of anything in Australia, it is rocks.

Maybe they could go and live in Goulburn

February 11, 2006

A Quiet Triumph of Intelligence

The citizens of Sydney are not dying of thirst in the streets, nor are we killing each other in knife fights over a 10 litre container at a communal standpipe, yet.

And after the news this weekend there is the slimmest of chances that the wide brown land of Australia might not end its days as the Somalia of the South Seas. The reason is that at some fundamental level of understanding, those of us who live on this small chain of fertile islands surrounded by seas of water and sand, actually get it about water.

How do I know? In yesterday's Sydney Morning Herald ran this story, Householders the big water savers.

THE battle to solve Sydney's water shortage is being won in its backyards, with gardeners and car owners conserving more water in a year than could be delivered by desalination and groundwater combined.

Since restrictions began in October 2003, Sydneysiders have saved 185 billion litres of water. Simple measures such as watering gardens less often and using buckets of water, not hoses, to wash cars have helped cut annual water consumption by 13 per cent, or 78 billion litres.

That compares with 45 billion litres a year that would have been provided by the Government's shelved $1.3 billion desalination plant, and about 30 billion litres a year for only three years from groundwater.

The problems with this great achievement are twofold; it occurred in an economic rationalist economy and it cost nothing to implement.

The first problem is that, in voluntarily reducing their water use, Sydneysiders have also reduced the income of Sydney Water, the corporation that supplies the water services. I'm not sure what the total might be, but since I am charged $1.013 per kilolitre (1,000 .litres) its not a big hop to see that Sydney Water is now OUT of pocket by about $78 million bucks.

The problem there is that we need Sydney water to have plenty of money because there is so much that needs doing; like maintaining reticulation systems that piddle water away by the truckload, like building and maintaining water recycling schemes instead of cheerfully conducting the fresh rain water into the nearest waterway and out to sea.

Unfortunately, economic rationalism doesn't work with scarcity of essentials such as water, nor can the market create profitable incentives for voluntary restraint and conservation. The more of the message we get, the less money our water management system will have to meet our needs, that's screwed up now and, in the longer run, could lead to the nasty picture I drew at the beginning as the economic rationalist basis for the system fails and the "business" goes bankrupt.

The other problem is that government, at all levels, is principally about feeding public money to large corporations. We know that is true because that is mostly what governments actually do; this is especially so in countries like mine where private industry is automatically assumed to be more competent, capable and less costly than publicly owned enterprises.

Although after the fiasco of the Public private Partnership on the London underground and our state premier last week calling the CEO of the privately owned road tunnel under the city, a fuckwit, maybe that is changing.

However, the reality is that governments come up $1.3 billion desalination plants, not because they are good ideas, but because they have to be seen to operate on scales that justify their existence; and for the cynical among us, to funnel (or tunnel) public money into the hands of large, corporate donors.

What is needed in fact is a networked solution to this problem, $1.3 billion spent on waterproofing Sydney, providing low cost loans for people to install optimal rainwater and greywater systems and composting toilets would leave them with nothing to put on their power point slides except boring numbers, no ribbons to cut and pretty well no post political directorships to scoop up.

They would, however, provide many small businesses such as plumbers and fabrication workshops with a lifetime's opportunity for useful work, hundreds, if not thousands of permanent jobs, distributed prosperity and workable water management.

In the process it would also create a genuine public private partnership, one that we could all have a role in, and build the model that we will desperately need as we start dealing with the long term effects of climate change, oil depletion and their economic effects.

We have shown that with the right information, we CAN act in our own, long term, best interests, all it takes is the right, clear message. The burning question is whether our political leadership has the nous to grasp those information tools, or whether they are going to be dragged along in our wake.

February 05, 2006

You can't Plan Emergence

Something very interesting is happening in New Orleans that bears closer study.

That the Federal and regional government has failed egregiously is not in doubt, from about 3 days before hurricane Katrina struck, the systems that are interwoven with a modern society began to fail and continued to do so, ever more awfully over the next month and continue to do so at every level.

At a macro level, nothing is happening. I suspect that, in fact nothing ever does at a macro level. The only reason that high level decisions appear to make any difference at all is that they are already supported by the buzzing infrastructure from which they emerged. Some bigwig makes a decision, feeds the right money plus the latest business management mantra down the line and things shift, often only to shift back again the next day, but they can and do happen.

Take away that infrastructure, that constant hum of human, financial, economic, status, energy, material and god knows what other kind of transaction and the commands stop working. They stop working because they are merely another frequency of hum traveling on the wave form that is human society. Wave forms, however, are not any thing, they are derivatives, emergent characteristics that can be observed but not touched. And they can't be commanded into existence with any amount of money, power, authority or force.

So New Orleans sits there, dumb as a rock, intransigent, oblivious to all the shouting at municipal (well that hardly exists now that the tax base has vanished) state or federal levels. Which is not to say that something is NOT happening. Amid the silence, the tiniest of hums has started up again. Out through the attenuated networks, a small word started to flow, if you go to the right office, you can end run the bureaucrats.

... down a spartan corridor on the eighth floor of City Hall ... hundreds of people clutch a piece of paper inscribed with a fateful percentage that could force them to abandon their home. The number is always over 50, and it means a house was so damaged in the flooding after Hurricane Katrina — more than half-ruined — that it faces demolition, unless the owner can come up with tens of thousands of dollars to raise it several feet above the ground and any future floodwaters.

But there is a way out, and that is why so many people stand in line every day, collectively transforming this battered city. "What you need to do is talk to a building inspector and get that lowered below 50 percent," a city worker calls out to the crowd. And at the end of the line, in a large open room down the hall, that is exactly what happens, nearly 90 percent of the time, New Orleans officials say.

By agreeing so often to these appeals — more than 6,000 over the last few months — city officials are in essence allowing random redevelopment to occur throughout the city, undermining a plan by Mayor C. Ray Nagin's rebuilding commission to hold off on building permits in damaged areas for several months until more careful planning can take place. That plan, greeted by widespread opposition, including from the mayor himself, is now essentially dead.

House by house, in devastated neighborhoods across the city, homeowners are bringing back their new-minted building permits and rebuilding New Orleans. As many as 500 such permits are issued every day, said Greg Meffert, the city official in charge of the rebuilding process. And there is no particular rhyme or reason to who gets a permit, or consideration of whether their neighborhoods can really support its previous residents.

One city building inspector, Devra Goldstein, called the proceedings on the eighth floor "really fly-by-night, chaotic, Wild West, get-what-you-want." The floor, she said, represents "a plan by default."

[...] In exchange for heavily-subsidized flood insurance for residents, the program expects cities to insist on flood-resistant construction. Some cities that violate the flood rules have been ousted from the insurance program, putting thousands of residents at huge risk. "They should be suspended, absolutely," said J. Robert Hunter, a former head of the federal flood-insurance program who is now director of insurance at the Consumer Federation of America. "You can't fake it," he said. "I sympathize with these people. But you shouldn't say 'Well, you're poor, therefore you can build in a dangerous place where you can be flooded again, and killed.' " He added, "You can't destroy the flood program to achieve a short-term goal."

The voice of the true bureaucrat echoes in the land. Here's the news Mr Hunter, the choice is between destroying the programme of destroying the lives of people who have nowhere else to go. The government plans have universally failed, and people are being kicked out of their temporary accommodation as the money ruins out.

As you fly into Mumbai you look down at the teeming slums built on the edge of the airport, under road bridges and overpasses and in swamps, trash mountains and dung hills.

As we learned from Katrina, from preparations for economic difficulties, peak oil and avian influenza, we are on our own and, more to the point, the systems we depend on are maximal, they do not handle exceptions well, they do not degrade elegantly, they scream up to the edge and then collapse. And, while the NY Times is perfectly able to find the story, apparently the agency in charge is as blind now as oit was when Katrina came howling up the Gulf of Mexico.

FEMA officials say they are keeping a close watch on New Orleans but consider the city to be following the rules. "I understand they have a process in place," said Michael Buckley, deputy director for mitigation at FEMA. "I wouldn't characterize it as a process to change the determination." Mr. Buckley said he was "not aware" of any large-scale downsizing of damage assessments.

It appears that two major qualifications for high office, be it political or corporate, are the memory of an Alzheimers sufferer and a sunny obliviousness. Far from Total Awareness, those charged with governance at every level, Sarbanes-Oxley notwithstanding, continue to exhibit minimal, or negative awareness.

Fortunately, they don't appear to be getting too much in the way.

November 07, 2005

Time IS Money

I've long been pushing the barrow that says connectivity in the developing world will not be through PC's and Telecentres, but rather robust mobile devices, probably cellphones or the WiFi equivalent of them. And they will become, if they aren't already, seriously important components of their economies in unexpected ways.

The latest wrinkles come via Andrius Kulikauskas and the folks at Cyfranogi

Continue reading "Time IS Money" »

Catching Up

Its been a quiet blogging month but things have been busy in the background. The Stockholm Challenge has really started to take off.

Usually about this stage of the process (2 months to go) we have about 300 projects registered. But this time we already had over 500 logged in and then we had SPIDER (part of SIDA) come on board with a 10,000 Euro sponsorship for an African project and throwing in another 5,000 Euros for the Public Admin category winner. Next it was Sun Microsystems to ante up 5k for the Education category and we are negotiating for similar awards to go with each of the other categories.

Continue reading "Catching Up" »